[RFC] Possible KView Maintainership

[James Richard Tyrer]

Jakob Petsovits wrote:
> On Monday 24 October 2005 18:17, James Richard Tyrer wrote:
> 
>>As I said, features that work better in more advanced applications are
>>feature bloat -- an image viewer doesn't need to be able to modify and
>>save images.
> 
> 
> An image viewer needs to turn images by 90 degrees and save them.
> The Windows image viewer does it, all proper image viewers do it,
> and it's quite a necessity for newly taken photos.

Yes, that action it is needed for that purpose, but is it necessary for 
KView to do it.  KDE has an application for digital photos.

OTOH, yes if we are going to have integrated applications then we would 
need it.

-- 
JRT