SVN timing

[Isaac Clerencia]

On Wednesday, 23 de March de 2005 23:00, Alexander Neundorf wrote:
> I know svn has real advantages over cvs, and converting the server takes
> only 12 hours.
> Have also the other issues been considered ?
> -is svn now actually fast enough ? From previous mails it seems it's
> significantly slower than cvs. Is this true ?
It uses less bandwith than CVS, but I'm not sure what do you mean with 
"slower" exactly.

> -is it mature enough ? (the segfault, the problems you found during
> testing, etc.)
Using here for a year without any problem.

> and the time the switch will consume:
> every developer has to:
> -find out its cvs password again (0..X h), how ?
> -learn to use svn ( 1 h )
> -recheckout everything ( > 2 h), not everybody has >= DSL
do it while you sleep/have lunch/get your children from school ...

> -recompile everything ( > 4 h)
use ccache, do it while you sleep ...

> So, we really do want to switch, don't we ?
Sure

-- 
Isaac Clerencia at Warp Networks, http://www.warp.es
Work: <isaac at warp.es>   | Debian: <isaac at debian.org>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 240 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-core-devel/attachments/20050323/0d42a5d8/attachment.sig>