[RFC] Security and Features in KPDF

[Brad Hards]

On Mon, 3 Jan 2005 11:08 am, Ingo Klöcker wrote:
> Unfortunately, Stephan's suggestion is also not a very good solution
> because you can be sure that several distributions will make "kpdf
> --script %u" the default for PDF "because it's so convenient".
As the other side of this, how about only allowing a whitelist of "safe" 
options. We could pre-populate it with things that are unlikely to get us 
into trouble (eg koffice documents, maybe), and allow the user to add others. 
Just use the same sort of settings / wording as KMail has - "you may 
compromise your privacy, etc".

Brad
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-core-devel/attachments/20050103/7fca3495/attachment.sig>