[PATCH] KSpell Unicode problem (BR#86940)

Waldo Bastian bastian at kde.org
Sun Feb 20 17:46:23 GMT 2005


On Saturday 19 February 2005 11:40, Anders Lund wrote:
> On Saturday 19 February 2005 11:26, Lukáš Tinkl wrote:
> > > I vote for "#ifdef HAVE_ASPELL_60" approach. I do not know how to
> > > implement it, though.
> > >
> > > What do the others think? Any idea how to solve it?
> >
> > Yes, I wanted to suggest the ifdef approach too; anyone volunteers to
> > write the configure check? :)
>
> So after upgrading aspell over that line, you'll need to recompile kdelibs?
> Can't aspell be queried for its version, and the string handled
> accordingly?
>
> -anders

Sure, see patch (or update to latest CVS), please test. Does it detect aspell 
v0.60 correctly?

Cheers,
Waldo
-- 
bastian at kde.org   |   Free Novell Linux Desktop 9 Evaluation Download
bastian at suse.com  |   http://www.novell.com/products/desktop/eval.html
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: kspell_aspell.patch
Type: text/x-diff
Size: 2612 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-core-devel/attachments/20050220/c48714f1/attachment.patch>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-core-devel/attachments/20050220/c48714f1/attachment.sig>


More information about the kde-core-devel mailing list