Future of KDE Development (solaris)

[Brad Hards]

On Fri, 18 Feb 2005 22:34 pm, Adriaan de Groot wrote:
> On Friday 18 February 2005 11:48, Waldo Bastian wrote:
> > > Is there something in particular that needs to be done to the
> > > development process for KDE4? If so, please describe the issue and
> > > proposed solution, since I think you have an attentive audience. If
> > > not, Waldo's suggestion (roughly "if it isn't obvious what to do, turn
> > > up to kde-core-devel and discuss it") sounds like the best way forward.
> >
> > Now let's head over to http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=99680
>
> And, gosh, it'll take about 15 minutes to fix that one. .. done.
As I indicated in an attachment to the bug (just after AdG fixed it), perhaps 
there is a cleaner way than yet another compile time check and some #ifdefs. 
I'm thinking that we don't need those includes at all (if it wasn't needed on 
Solaris or Linux...).

It would be good if we could figure out "hey, we don't actually need those 
headers on _any_ platform we support - it was just a cut-n-paste from some 
other source" cases. Not sure the best way to do that though, unless KDE gets 
a compile farm...

Brad
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-core-devel/attachments/20050218/b8aca2fe/attachment.sig>