Build system (was Re: Future of KDE Development)

[Stanislav Karchebny]

On Thursday 17 February 2005 10:29, Mike Richardson wrote:
> On Wednesday 16 February 2005 15:08, Michael Nottebrock wrote:
> > I'm pretty indifferent to which build system I'll have to wrap my head
> > around to fix portability issues in the future, but: Of all the
> > candidates proposed to replace autotools, has anybody actually *tried*
> > those on !Linux yet?
> >
> > I've stopped trusting webpages saying "this is portable" - more often
> > than not it really means "is believed to be portable".
>
> rekall (www.rekallrevealed.org) uses scons and builds:
>
> Linux/KDE
> Linux/QT3-only
> Mac OS/X
> Windows (using mingw)

Can you please cross-build it for windows on linux using xmingw, please please 
please? You can post results here or CC them to me.

-- 
keep in touch. berkus.

Roey on #kde-devel: when I hear best of breed I tune out--it's too much a 
buzzword. What I carry between my legs is best of breed. And like KDE, just 
because it's less visible doesn't mean it gets less usage.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-core-devel/attachments/20050218/03d4a095/attachment.sig>