Future of KDE Development

Stanislav Karchebny berk at upnet.ru
Mon Feb 14 23:49:03 GMT 2005


On Tuesday 15 February 2005 00:50, Alexander Neundorf wrote:

> > That's why I vote for a KDE 3.5 release.
>
> This sounds very reasonable.
> To keep problems to a minimum, kdelibs should stay frozen except for
> bugfixes, so app developers will never have to update kdelibs to keep their
> apps working. IOW all 3.5 apps should work with KDE 3.4 too.

I second that. Sounds like a good plan.

-- 
keep in touch. berkus.

Roey on #kde-devel: when I hear best of breed I tune out--it's too much a 
buzzword. What I carry between my legs is best of breed. And like KDE, just 
because it's less visible doesn't mean it gets less usage.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-core-devel/attachments/20050215/69b0aa1e/attachment.sig>


More information about the kde-core-devel mailing list