Kevin Krammer kevin.krammer at gmx.at
Fri Dec 23 17:56:11 GMT 2005

On Friday 23 December 2005 18:53, Kevin Ottens wrote:
> Le Vendredi 23 Décembre 2005 17:38, Thiago Macieira a écrit :
> > We already do.
> Yes, the current situation is basically:
> session<->system : DBUS
> session<->session : DCOP
> I guess that this situation is not ideal, but the protocols being used for
> different purposes that's not a big issue.
> The problem is more in a not too distant future, we might want to
> communicate inside the session with non KDE apps. And that's where the real
> troubles will arise.
> From there the real questions are : will non KDE apps using dbus for
> communication inside the session exist? is communication with them
> important?

I expect that some of the aspects of the "Portland" project solutions will 
require or recommend some kind of session bus interface.


Kevin Krammer <kevin.krammer at gmx.at>
Qt/KDE Developer, Debian User
Moderator: www.mrunix.de (German), www.qtforum.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-core-devel/attachments/20051223/4f86792f/attachment.sig>

More information about the kde-core-devel mailing list