Martin Konold martin.konold at erfrakon.de
Sun Dec 11 23:37:25 GMT 2005

Am Montag, 12. Dezember 2005 00:11 schrieb Lubos Lunak:


>  Zack apparently felt (and he was).

Yes, thanks for hinting me!

>  It can. The spec says a process, not a separate process, in fact it
> explicitly says it doesn't have to be a separate process. In KDE's case it
> could very well be yet another kded module.

ok, this is no issue then anymore.

> > In addition I also don't like the fact that it is tight to X11. IMHO new
> > cross desktop stuff shall not depend on X if there is not a very
> > compelling reason for this. IMHO simple exchange of strings is no good
> > reason for depending on X.
>  And the magic solution is?

I have not final opinion about it but why using X at all for this? Why cant it 
be handled by some DBUS stuff?

-- martin

Erlewein, Frank, Konold & Partner - Beratende Ingenieure und Physiker

More information about the kde-core-devel mailing list