Redefining kdelibs and kdebase

[Michael Pyne]

On Saturday 27 August 2005 22:11, David Johnson wrote:
> On Saturday 27 August 2005 06:46 pm, Michael Pyne wrote:
> > That and applications would lose the ability to customize the file
> > dialog. And if you think Windows's was bad, wait until you see the
> > one in GNOME (any of them really) =D
>
> Is GNOME's closer to GIMP's dialog or Inkscape's? GIMP's truly sucks.
> Inkscape's isn't horrible, but KDE's is still better.

It depends on the version of GTK+ you have, and whether the program in 
question has been re-written to support it (since apparently they have 
different interfaces).

But basically there's either the crappy one with the line edit and the 
separate micro-sized directory and file boxes, or the crappy one with no line 
edit and the single micro-sized directory and file box.  Presumably the user 
finds the concept of /a/directory/file far too complex to even allow it to be 
shown to them. (Speaking of which, for those who don't like media:/ and the 
like, remember that it could always be worse...)

Regards,
 - Michael Pyne
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-core-devel/attachments/20050827/d6cc4880/attachment.sig>