Office/ and Utilities/ menu reorganization

[Michael Nottebrock]

On Monday, 8. August 2005 18:34, Andras Mantia wrote:
> On Monday 08 August 2005 18:06, Matthias Welwarsky wrote:
> > If applications are less important or immature they should not be
> > shipped by default. Just release them separately.
>
> That's not a real solution for the "less important" applications.
> Releasing together with KDE means much more than "my app is inside KDE
> by default". It also gives you some infrastructure and things you don't
> need to care about like the release management and package creation.

It would probably make release management quite a bit easier for everyone 
involved if KDE would lose a substantial portion of the applications it's 
currently shipping instead of keeping adding new ones. Kdeextragear is very 
much the way to go there.

I can say with confidence that it would definitely make package creation 
easier for those who do need to care about it.

-- 
   ,_,   | Michael Nottebrock               | lofi at freebsd.org
 (/^ ^\) | FreeBSD - The Power to Serve     | http://www.freebsd.org
   \u/   | K Desktop Environment on FreeBSD | http://freebsd.kde.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-core-devel/attachments/20050808/393977dc/attachment.sig>