Behaviour of const KSharedPtrs

[Stefan Teleman]

You were right in your first reply -- i completely misunderstood your 
question.

--Stefan

-----

On Friday 12 November 2004 20:29, Richard Smith wrote:
> No. You just assigned to a non-lvalue. What's your point? And how
> does that relate to the fact that KDE's KSharedPtr, a smart pointer
> class template, does not behave like a pointer (or like any other
> smart pointer implementation I know of)?
>
> Oh, and please don't top-post :)

-- 
Stefan Teleman          'Nobody Expects the Spanish Inquisition'
steleman at nyc.rr.com                          -Monty Python