Moving kfilereplace to kdeutils
michaelnottebrock at gmx.net
Sat Nov 13 00:01:41 GMT 2004
On Friday, 12. November 2004 21:05, Knut Morten Johansson wrote:
> On Friday 12 November 2004 Michael Nottebrock wrote:
> >Move Cervisia out of KDE and into kdeextragear. If it looks like packagers
> >will have to package it standalone anyway to be able to resolve the
> >dependencies Quanta and KDevelop have on it properly, there's no point in
> >dragging it along with kdesdk. Thinking about it, most of the recent
> >additions to kdesdk really would lead a better life in KEG, kompare,
> >umbrello, kcachegrind...
> Most packagers builds standalone packages for all of those anyway so I
> whats your point.
I am a packager, and building standalone packages from kde module tarballs is
not a trivial task (especially if you have both binary packages and a
source-build framework to worry about). Of course this weighs in more heavily
of you're (like me) an unpaid packager in a rather small team of other unpaid
> The clue with having different modules are to group
> programs which makes sens to keep together, ether for dependency issues or
> area of usage.
> kdesdk - tools to help development, which kompare, umbrello, kcachegrind
> and Cervisia does.
See my other mail regarding that.
> If you are looking for dependency problems, I suggest find the real ones.
> Like kdesdk depending on kdepim at compiletime. (My last CVS build was some
> time ago, 23/9). I think it was KBugBuster or Kbabel who wanted
KBugBuster, and it's not news to me.
,_, | Michael Nottebrock | lofi at freebsd.org
(/^ ^\) | FreeBSD - The Power to Serve | http://www.freebsd.org
\u/ | K Desktop Environment on FreeBSD | http://freebsd.kde.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
More information about the kde-core-devel