A home for KIMProxy

[Will Stephenson]

On Friday 28 May 2004 19:45, Jason Keirstead wrote:
> libkimproxy defintly does not belong in here. The DCOP IDL spec for it
> could go in here, because that describes a generic interface. But a library
> that contains implementation code like libkimproxy would be way out of
> place.

How about the following proposal:

interface and service definition in interfaces/kimproxy

library in kio/kimproxy

Will

-- 
Will Stephenson
IRC: Bille