splitting up distro packages (was: KDE 4 modules structure (again))
Oswald Buddenhagen
ossi at kde.org
Sun Mar 14 18:25:28 GMT 2004
On Sun, Mar 14, 2004 at 07:09:23PM +0100, Dominique Devriese wrote:
> 4 There are no downsides, if you provide proper metapackages.
>
while i generally agree to the split-it-up!-attitude, this statement is
simply wrong ...
- more packages mean more administrative information; the package
manager's memory consumption and cpu power requirements grow. and dpkg
with its plain text control files is especially slow.
- many packages are always a problem if you cannot resort to automatic
dependency tracking & downloading - for example when you want to
install a single up-to-date program on an off-line machine.
greetings
--
Hi! I'm a .signature virus! Copy me into your ~/.signature, please!
--
Chaos, panic, and disorder - my work here is done.
More information about the kde-core-devel
mailing list