[PATCH] drkonqi: s/backtrace/backtrace full/g

[Stephan Kulow]

On Tuesday 27 January 2004 13:59, Dominique Devriese wrote:
> Stephan Kulow writes:
> 
> > On Tuesday 27 January 2004 12:26, Dominique Devriese wrote:
> >> I'm going to commit this to HEAD unless someone objects.
> > I think, what's needed here is a check if the first bt command gave
> > any useful output. Otherwise the full one won't add much but
> > nonsense. 
> 
> Is it a problem to add some more nonsense ?
Yes, because they just cause work load.
> 
> > I would really like to have code in there that hides the fact that
> > there is a bug tracking system if the user runs the usual gentoo or
> > mandrake packages ;(
> 
> Sorry, I'm not familiar with those packages, but I assume you're
> implying they're broken...  Anyway, this is not really related, or is
> it ?
Not broken in the usual sense. Just stripped of any information that 
would make it possible to make sense out of the backtrace

Greetings, Stephan

-- 
There may be no I in TEAM, but a M and an E.