[PATCH] drkonqi: s/backtrace/backtrace full/g
coolo at kde.org
Tue Jan 27 13:27:36 GMT 2004
On Tuesday 27 January 2004 13:59, Dominique Devriese wrote:
> Stephan Kulow writes:
> > On Tuesday 27 January 2004 12:26, Dominique Devriese wrote:
> >> I'm going to commit this to HEAD unless someone objects.
> > I think, what's needed here is a check if the first bt command gave
> > any useful output. Otherwise the full one won't add much but
> > nonsense.
> Is it a problem to add some more nonsense ?
Yes, because they just cause work load.
> > I would really like to have code in there that hides the fact that
> > there is a bug tracking system if the user runs the usual gentoo or
> > mandrake packages ;(
> Sorry, I'm not familiar with those packages, but I assume you're
> implying they're broken... Anyway, this is not really related, or is
> it ?
Not broken in the usual sense. Just stripped of any information that
would make it possible to make sense out of the backtrace
There may be no I in TEAM, but a M and an E.
More information about the kde-core-devel