[PATCH] drkonqi: s/backtrace/backtrace full/g

[Dominique Devriese]

Stephan Kulow writes:

> On Tuesday 27 January 2004 12:26, Dominique Devriese wrote:
>> I'm going to commit this to HEAD unless someone objects.
> I think, what's needed here is a check if the first bt command gave
> any useful output. Otherwise the full one won't add much but
> nonsense. 

Is it a problem to add some more nonsense ?

> I would really like to have code in there that hides the fact that
> there is a bug tracking system if the user runs the usual gentoo or
> mandrake packages ;(

Sorry, I'm not familiar with those packages, but I assume you're
implying they're broken...  Anyway, this is not really related, or is
it ?

cheers
domi