Moving pop, imap and smtp koslaves from kdebase to kdepim

[Bo Thorsen]

On Thursday 08 January 2004 02:20, Ingo Klöcker wrote:
> On Wednesday 07 January 2004 18:05, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> > Bo Thorsen wrote:
> > >On Wednesday 07 January 2004 03:39, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> > >> I don't suppose the PIM developers counted on having to maintain
> > >> binary and behaviour compatibility with the ioslaves as they will
> > >> be released in KDE 3.2, have they?
> > >
> > >No need for this - you don't link directly to a slave. Just like you
> > > don't need to maintain binary compatibility for an executable for
> > > the shell to be able to start it.
> >
> > Agreed. Drop the binary compatibility issue. But the question remains
> > for behaviour compatibility.
>
> Of course the slaves will be behavior compatible. The KDE 3.2 slaves
> are all behavior compatible with all KDE 3 applications (written for
> KDE 3.0, 3.1 and 3.2). This won't change with the separate release.
> What makes you think that we would violate binary and/or behavior
> compatibility?

I think we should stop this thread. The RD has said he won't have the 
slaves moved. Resistance is futile.

Bo.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: signature
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-core-devel/attachments/20040108/f05cb9a1/attachment.sig>