Qt Cryptographic Architecture

[Daniel Molkentin]

On Tuesday 06 January 2004 18:38, George Staikos wrote:
>> FWIW, i recently exchanged emails with the gnutls maintainer and we
>> briefly discussed how he would feel about the use of gnutls in KDE. he's
>> quite supportive and seems willing to provide expertise and consultation
>> to whomever would be doing the actual KDE coding ...
>
>    Not only is gnutls incomplete for KDE's purposes, but it's a huge waste
> of resources to rewrite SSL support in KDE at this stage.

But it sounds like a good idea to me for KDE 4.0. OpenSSL is a pain in the 
butt  (especially b/c wise as you stressed yourself several times) and GNUTLS 
seems to actively work on getting the remaining needed features implemented.

It would also end the licensing discussions.

Cheers,
  Daniel
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: signature
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-core-devel/attachments/20040106/a566e141/attachment.sig>