A humble packager's request: Retire kdeaddons.

[Ingo Klöcker]

On Friday 13 February 2004 06:54, Rob Kaper wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 12, 2004 at 03:19:16PM +0100, David Faure wrote:
> > Well, at least not a module which depends on other things (like
> > kdeaddons), possibly leading to cyclic dependencies.
> >
> > kdesupport, on the other hand, sounds fine - it's at the bottom of
> > the chain, and is optional if people can get taglib by other means
> > (released tarballs).
>
> Someone will come up with it at some point, so let's be the first:
> couldn't/shouldn't arts also be in there, then?

I see no reason to move arts there. What's wrong with the arts module? 
Or do you just fear that your taglib would be lonely in kdesupport? ;-)

Regards,
Ingo
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: signature
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-core-devel/attachments/20040213/dd42e165/attachment.sig>