[OT] some weird GPL licensing questions

[Roberto Alsina]

> On Monday 09 February 2004 22:12, Peter S Galbraith wrote:
>> Alexander Neundorf <neundorf at kde.org> wrote:
>> > So here we go:
>> > AFAIK the GPL mainly says that if you have the binary version of
>> > something you have the right to get the sources of this version.
>>
>> Yes, but only _from_ the person who gave you the binary.  If you give
>> binar+source to party B and party B give a binary-only to party C, then
>> party C can't force _you_ to give source.
>
> This is new to me. Which part of the GPL says this ?

It's more like, no part says you have to.

-- 
 ("\''/").__..-''"`-. .         Roberto Alsina
 `9_ 9  )   `-. (    ).`-._.`)  ralsina at kde.org
 (_Y_.)' ._   ) `._`.  " -.-'   KDE Developer (MFCH)
  _..`-'_..-_/ /-'_.'
(l)-'' ((i).' ((!.'             Buenos Aires - Argentina
Imminentizing the eschaton since 1971.