[PATCH] DrKonqi detection of invalid backtraces

[Stephan Kulow]

On Thursday 05 February 2004 15:57, Lubos Lunak wrote:
>  Ok to commit, and possibly backport (that would mean i18n changes, but IMHO 
> it'd be worth it)? Should it show useless (well, recognized as useless) 
> backtraces at all (human stupidity should not be underestimated, I wouldn't 
> be that surprised to see one such backtrace pasted at bugs.kde.org together 
> with the explanation saying it's useless)?
Next to the bug reports saying that konqueror opened a message box that the
SMB network is busted :)

I would say, go forward with the backport - you need to have some basic english
vocabular to report bugs to us anyway (and the merge script runs in the branch
on a regular base now, so the translators might see the string much earlier than it
used to be)

Greetings, Stephan

-- 
There may be no I in TEAM, but a M and an E.