Moving kdcop
Luke Chatburn
lchatburn at isset.org
Mon Feb 2 22:17:03 GMT 2004
The key concept of DCOP is to facilitate users (aiming roughly at SMB office
workers) manipulating the system to produce quick solutions to problems. One
of the defining examples I have heard given, is to allow secretaries to
manage the schedules of a dozen managers at the same time and organise
meetings in an automated way.
DCOP is very much an end-user technology, and it is impotent without the
ability of users to investigate applications.
-Luke
----- Original Message -----
From: "Roberto Alsina" <ralsina at kde.org>
To: <kde-core-devel at kde.org>
Sent: Monday, February 02, 2004 10:10 PM
Subject: Re: Moving kdcop
>
> > On Monday 02 February 2004 22:57, Stephan Binner wrote:
> >> On Monday 02 February 2004 22:50, Frans Englich wrote:
> >> > Is not kdesdk a better place for kdcop?
> >>
> >> You forget to say why. kdcop can be used by users.
> >
> > Every app can be used by users. This is not a joke, for every single app
> > out
> > there it is usable for at least one user. But we can't force it on
> > everyone,
> > the resources in terms of usability and harddisc space simply not exist.
> >
> > If someone need to mix with KDE internals, those hackers can install
> > kdesdk,
> > just as everyone install koffice if they need office suite
functionality.
> >
> > Sounds reasonable?
>
> kdcop lets power users explore enough to create nice stuff like the
> googleclip thing from a couple of days ago.
>
> kdesdk usually has a dependency on a real development environment, which
> those power users don't really need.
>
> And come on, just how big *is* kdcop?
>
> It's 100K here, let's say 200K with docs? 70K gzipped? In a 9MB package?
;-)
>
> --
> ("\''/").__..-''"`-. . Roberto Alsina
> `9_ 9 ) `-. ( ).`-._.`) ralsina at kde.org
> (_Y_.)' ._ ) `._`. " -.-' KDE Developer (MFCH)
> _..`-'_..-_/ /-'_.'
> (l)-'' ((i).' ((!.' Buenos Aires - Argentina
> Imminentizing the eschaton since 1971.
>
More information about the kde-core-devel
mailing list