RFC: Removal of KAutoConfig / KAutoConfigDialog

[Ian Reinhart Geiser]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Wednesday 12 November 2003 09:24 pm, Benjamin Meyer wrote:
> > In essence: you might as well port to KConfigXT, not add
> > dependencies to depracated classes.
>
> No.  I will simply not commit all the work I have done once head opens
> again. I'll let you and everyone port them yourselves sense what I have
> done is "just a waste of time" and you wouldn't want it anyway.
>
> And your welcome for all of the work I have done so far.
See i dont like that reasoning one bit.  you are generating more work for 
others.   I think its nice you came up with a neat idea, but sorry it didnt 
sell.  As a team we have to own up to the fact we cannot go off lone cowboy 
all the time.  I think its a horrible waste of effort... its like me porting 
stuff to orbit now so i can do IPC... 

just my 2c
- -ian reinhart geiser
- -- 
- --:Ian Reinhart Geiser <geiseri at yahoo.com>
- --:Public Key: http://geiseri.myip.org/~geiseri/publickey.asc
- --:Public Calender: http://geiseri.myip.org/~geiseri/publicevents.ics
- --:Jabber: geiseri at geiseri.myip.org
- --:Be an optimist -- at least until they start moving animals in 
- --:   pairs to Cape Canaveral. ~ Source Unknown
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2-rc1-SuSE (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE/svRjPy62TRm8dvgRAmyXAJ9egO0e9ZtNiL4BGe/VaiAnbULhPwCgyS37
xk60wYhvcQonrFxIelmms28=
=pGRs
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----