deeper freeze

[Andras Mantia]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Wednesday 12 November 2003 12:43, Stephan Kulow wrote:
> On Wednesday 12 November 2003 11:37, Rob Kaper wrote:
> > Ironically, what you propose is a deeper freeze for applications that are
> > not considered to be very important to KDE than those that are, which
> > sounds backwards to me.
>
> You mix up things. I didn't talk about importance of applications, but
> about importance of user data. I simpy do not consider a patience session
> as important as a mail folder.
>
> Greetings, Stephan

I would say that a crash is important bug and should be fixed anywhere it 
appears. If somebody is the maintainer of app X and the app X crashes but 
doesn't cause serious data loss, why shouldn't the maintainer of app X fix 
the crash? It would be absurd to not do so.

Andras

- -- 
Quanta Plus developer - http://quanta.sourceforge.net
K Desktop Environment - http://www.kde.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2-rc1-SuSE (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE/shTJTQdfac6L/08RAuy3AKDjJ9kfSPB9xL4qRXLp80ctXMU+iQCffaoa
Oui7WiQibOnpbIk/L3PFU+8=
=b9oI
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----