KDE 3.2 release cycle
Rainer Endres
endres at physos.org
Sun May 11 20:40:16 BST 2003
Hi
Well, I am not really a core developer, so I am not sure if my voice has any
weight in this, but I can remember the impact the KDE2 and KDE3 meetings had
on development. Loads of new ideas, features and revolutions got implemented.
Is it really planned to let all this slip because KDE 3.2 may be in feature
freeze after Nove Hardy? I know there is branching, but there are too many
make_it_cool branches already. HEAD should be the place for the heavy
development.
Stephan, I have no idea, if you have a rough time scale in mind, but please
consider at least the branching KDE_3_2_BRANCH very shortly after Nove Hardy
to allow for new features to mature in HEAD and not to being rushed in
KDE3.2.
Please take the meeting into account when thinking about the next releases.
On the other hand I really support Stephans point about the bugs. Our bug
database of open or new bugs is growing constantly. A KDE release with over
2300 known bugs is not really something to be proud of.
Just my thoughts.
Rainer
More information about the kde-core-devel
mailing list