bug handling policy / interaction with users

[Matthias Welwarsky]

On Sunday 16 March 2003 01:30, Roberto H. Alsina wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 16 2003 at 01:25:31am +0100, Guillaume Laurent wrote:
> > On Saturday 15 March 2003 22:03, Tim Jansen wrote:
> > > It is not realistic to expect that this will change as long as
> > > components are done by unpaid volunteers.
> >
> > Being a volunteer doesn't mean you have no responsibility involved.
>
> Not being paid is not an excuse not to be polite, but
> it surely is an excuse not to be bossed around like an employee.

maybe, but being "bossed around" is something else than being given suggestion 
or advice. Some people seem to think about KDE development as the 
dictatorship of the developer over the user. This does not sound sensible to 
me.

regards,
	matze

-- 
Matthias Welwarsky
Fachschaft Informatik FH Darmstadt
Email: matze at stud.fbi.fh-darmstadt.de

"all software sucks equally, but some software is more equal"
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: signature
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-core-devel/attachments/20030317/91f24962/attachment.sig>