glib in kdesupport: yes or no?
neundorf at kde.org
Mon Mar 10 20:47:45 GMT 2003
On Monday 10 March 2003 00:34, Adam Treat wrote:
> Hey, I think common specs are fine as long as the spec is good. We will
> probably still run into some fundamental differences though. However, I
> don't think you should play down the implementation details. Can you even
> tell us if you guys are willing to use C++ for any of this? The stuff on
> your list that is not specs: config, sound system, component/runtime, VFS
> and KIO are not trivial pieces. I don't want KDE to abandon a successful
> strategy where we use Qt as an underlying basis.
E.g. ioslaves run in a separate process, so the process which is using them
doesn't have to link to the libraries which the ioslave links to.
The data is transferred over a pipe, and I think the control commands also go
through this pipe, so this could be done the same way from a non
Work: alexander.neundorf at jenoptik.com - http://www.jenoptik-los.de
Home: neundorf at kde.org - http://www.kde.org
alex at neundorf.net - http://www.neundorf.net
More information about the kde-core-devel