glib in kdesupport: yes or no?

[Marc Mutz]

On Monday 10 March 2003 16:30, Christoph Cullmann wrote:
<snip>
> In short: I think the policy "no qt lib, as it is gpl" of the gnome
> project should be reconsidered :/ They run around as the GNU Network
> ....... project but don't want to link against a gpl lib, amusing, at
> least in my eyes :)
<snip>

So how is the KDE requirement of kdelibs being LGPL (X11, BSD, etc, and 
explicitely _not_ GPL) any different?

Marc

-- 
It's one thing to accept a risk to your own data, but quite another to
standardize on something that imposes that risk on others, no matter
how unlikely you think it is that anything "really bad" will happen,
and no matter how desirable the outcome.  -- Bart Schaefer, on ietf-822
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: signature
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-core-devel/attachments/20030310/b28dddaf/attachment.sig>