glib in kdesupport: yes or no?

[Ian Reinhart Geiser]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Sunday 09 March 2003 11:28 pm, Andreas Pour wrote:
> Maks Orlovich wrote:
> > > Here is a list of stuff we haven't started on in earnest but should
> > > start, that I presented at FOSDEM:
> >
> > Is there a lower grade than F?
> > Sounds like what George Staikos assigned for communication on these
> > issues isn't quite low enough.
>
> KDE is facing institutional problems right now.  The way I see it a small
> group of people thinks they "run" KDE, whereas they really do not.  They
> thrive on secrecy.  Their methods will not prevail.
>
Ummm have you been reading the list, or IRC?

This seems like we have quite a discussion, and everyone who has something to 
say has been saying it.

> KDE needs to remain what it has always been:  free, open, "democractic". 
> No more back-room deals.  That is unacceptable.

We have a few core guys who DO quite a bit, and KDE has always been guided by 
the doers... Are you saying we need more backseat drivers?  

Just a little confused here.
- -ian reinhart geiser
- -- 
- --:Ian Reinhart Geiser <geiseri at yahoo.com>
- --:Public Key: http://geiseri.myip.org:8080/publickey.txt
- --:Jabber: geiseri at geiseri.myip.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE+bBoIPy62TRm8dvgRAkROAJ462NLJDA48SaCSKqcBXaP8EPhSiACfeFVe
CPOZsc35iFsFPcDVEc9I3Xc=
=C4J7
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----