bad gcc's (2.96 20000731) (Was: Re: Confirm bugs! (Was: Re: About 3.2 - note to bugfixers))

[Alexander Kellett]

On Sun, Mar 09, 2003 at 12:04:08AM +0100, Alexander Kellett wrote:
> sorry but its a commonly known fact that 2.96 
> with a date such as 20000731 is buggy as hell.
> take a look the backtraces. absolute crap.

and this i take back with this reference.
   http://www.geocrawler.com/archives/3/84/2000/12/0/4866465/
and the fact that asplinux uses 2.96-116.

i'm guessing asplinux just screwed up.
or all of these people have no clue what 
memtest86 is. sorry redhat. 

anyways, i'll just keep doing the same
as usual which is basically what ossi 
suggested.

thanks for the input all,
Alex