KDE 3.2 release plan=?iso-8859-1?q?notice

[Oswald Buddenhagen]

On Mon, Jun 16, 2003 at 11:11:06PM +0200, Martijn Klingens wrote:
> On Monday 16 June 2003 03:04, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
> > just in case it wasn't clear: i emphasize that we are arguing solely
> > about terminology, not about the schedules themselves.
> 
> Though I more or less agree with this my point is that a weekly RC
> makes no sense. You can have multiple RCs a week or one every few
> weeks or whatever, but the "RC-defining" rule is the code quality and
> not the calendar.
> 
yep, that's the whole point. it's simple logic: you _cannot_ plan beyond
the first RC, as if you do, the first RC isn't a RC any more. q.e.d. :)
ergo, one or two "gamma"s and _one_ RC should be scheduled, with the
notice that more RCs _could_ be done, if required.

greetings

-- 
Hi! I'm a .signature virus! Copy me into your ~/.signature, please!
--
Chaos, panic, and disorder - my work here is done.