Drafting a policy? [was: Re: Qt 3.2 requirement]

[Ralf Nolden]

On Mittwoch, 30. Juli 2003 11:49, Stephan Kulow wrote:
> On Wednesday 30 July 2003 09:08, Ralf Nolden wrote:
> > BTW: why do we have a release coordinator to decide about such things ?
> > Stephan ? :-)
>
> I already expressed in another mail, but to repeat it explicitly: so far
> I don't see a reason to jump on a 3.2 requirement as it doesn't give
> us any features we can't live without. But I suggest for the betas we'll
> require 3.2 to limit the testing space.

Ok, now we only need to know the bugs that KDE 3.1.x shows when running with 
Qt 3.2 like Waldo suggested and we *finally* have a roadmap that one can 
orientate on :-)

I would like to keep track of the branch's requirements so Chris Cheney and 
the other debian maintainers know what to expect and I can schedule with 
Martin when to switch to Qt 3.2 in unstable as soon as the build requirement 
for the branch has < Qt 3.2 dropped.

Ralf
>
> Greetings, Stephan

-- 
We're not a company, we just produce better code at less costs.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Ralf Nolden
nolden at kde.org

The K Desktop Environment       The KDevelop Project
http://www.kde.org              http://www.kdevelop.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: signature
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-core-devel/attachments/20030730/9bfa5540/attachment.sig>