Qt 3.2 requirement

[Rob Kaper]

On Mon, Jul 28, 2003 at 12:14:50PM +0200, Bernhard Reiter wrote:
> One idea would be to be more strict about separating bug-fixes
> from new features.

We do. KDE_3_1_BRANCH vs HEAD. KDE 3.2 is a feature release, not a bug fix
release.

> If QT 3.2 is close to a bug-fix only release, 
> it might be the right thing to switch the KDE 3.2 requirements to it.

No, if it's a bug fix release, it might be the right thing to upgrade to it for KDE
3.1.4. KDE 3.2 is fair terrority..

(http://developer.kde.org/development-versions/kde-3.2-release-plan.html
could use a little adjustment to work in Lynx though, the week by week of
what is allowed is tough to spot without colors and it's KDE policy not to
use colors as indication of good/bad, maybe we should apply the same to our
web family.

Rob
-- 
Rob Kaper     | "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little
cap at capsi.com | temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
www.capsi.com | - Benjamin Franklin, Historical Review of Pennsylvania, 1759
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-core-devel/attachments/20030728/610b615c/attachment.sig>