wanted: autotools guru/kulow, i18n diety/diehl

[Tim Jansen]

On Saturday 26 July 2003 14:58, Rob Kaper wrote:
> > What about the QT or QT/E dependency? Is quite a big one ...
> Qt/E can be made rather small and it would remove the dependency on my own
> network library. Furthermore, I believe QString and other classes are
> definitely preferable over STL. Would have chosen tinyQ but it doesn't have
> slots/signals and thus not QServerSocket either.

This is pretty interesting for me, since I am also working on a Qt-based 
server. So far I've targeted TinyQ, but I'd like to use the Qt event loop and 
also newer Qt features (TinyQ is still 3.0). 

Maybe it would make sense to share a Qt/E configuration for Qt-based servers.

bye...