Three different tab implementations

[Daniel Stone]

On Thu, Jan 30, 2003 at 06:44:13PM -0800, Neil Stevens scrawled:
> On Thursday January 30, 2003 06:33, Rob Kaper wrote:
> > We can either decide to refuse MDI alltogether (and revert a whole lot
> > of tabbing code) or accept MDI and extend the KDE core (I do agree that
> > viewport management is probably best handled within the window manager,
> > but I'm not sure if the netwm specs says) to handle it properly, or at
> > least more properly than 4 different implementations would.
> 
> False dichotomy.  Another option is the current one:  Accept MDI as mostly 
> hidden, non-default settings, added at the discretion of the app 
> maintainer.

I'm sure you'll stop using a.out and candles to tell the time,
eventually. I foolishly maintain that there's hope for you yet.

-- 
Daniel Stone                                     <dstone at trinity.unimelb.edu.au>
Developer, Trinity College, University of Melbourne
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-core-devel/attachments/20030131/0410dd68/attachment.sig>