supporting web standards, not renderers, was: khtml and safari
Kurt Pfeifle
kpfeifle at danka.de
Thu Jan 9 22:04:19 GMT 2003
Neil Stevens wrote:
> On Thursday January 09, 2003 04:47, Cristian Tibirna wrote:
>
>>In a perfect dream world, yes. We live in a real (crappy) world. Thus,
>>the proposition of Charles makes sense. Yes, we _can_ try to change the
>>world, but one little step at a time. Revolutions are a harmful
>>invention of humanity. Nature uses adaptation.
"Nature"?
Nature uses both. Both: both at "their" and both at one time...
And often one part's adaption is another part's revolution.
[ Hey, I've just witnessed a bottle of wine freezing over and
blasting its glass container.... ;-) ]
A much more harmful invention of humanity is one-sidedness,
and trying to establish one view as the "absolute truth".
There is no absolute truth neither in adaption nor in revolution.
But that's off-topic now....
> This isn't about revolution at all. This is about whether KDE will abstain
> or actively participate in the lock-in processes of others.
More information about the kde-core-devel
mailing list