Reason for -no-stl in qt-copy configure recommendation?

[Daniel Stone]

On Tue, Apr 29, 2003 at 07:27:32PM +0200, Guillaume Laurent wrote:
> I'm sorry but as far as I understand, your whole point is simply that if KDE 
> recommends '-stl' for compiling Qt, then every one will rush to use the STL 
> in KDE CVS and horrible things will happen. I find that extremely doubtful, 
> and I think you can trust KDE developers to understand such a simple 
> recommandation as "compile Qt with STL support for 3rd party applications, do 
> not use the STL in KDE CVS unless you really have to".

If you can't trust someone's basic judgement, why the hell are they
allowed to commit to CVS?

-- 
Daniel Stone 	     <daniel at raging.dropbear.id.au>             <dstone at kde.org>
KDE: Konquering a desktop near you - http://www.kde.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-core-devel/attachments/20030430/87dfea79/attachment.sig>