Qt 3.1b1

[Vadim Plessky]

On Tuesday 10 September 2002 2:54 am, Waldo Bastian wrote:
|  On Monday 09 September 2002 02:39 pm, Dirk Mueller wrote:
|  > On Mon, 09 Sep 2002, Matthias Ettrich wrote:
[...]
|  >
|  > Of course another thing to think about is wether KDE 3.1 should require
|  > Qt 3.1 or not, because then we're bound to the Qt 3.1 release date with
|  > our schedule.
|  >
|  > I haven't made up my mind yet if that is worth it. Feedback welcome,
|
|  I think waiting for Qt 3.1 (including some test period) would be nice
| because it will ensure that KDE 3.1 will work well with Qt 3.1. If we
| release before Qt 3.1 is released people will without doubt start using Qt
| 3.1 once it becomes available but we will not be able to fix any
| inter-operability issues that it may have.
|
|  It also means we can require Qt 3.1 for KDE 3.1, although I'm not exactly
| sure what kind of advantages Qt3.1 brings over Qt3.0 (Is there a changelog
| somewhere?)

Qt 3.1 has support for Xft2.

Taking into consideration that Mozilla 1.1 already support Xft2, I think KDE 
3.1 should *require* Qt 3.1

|
|  Cheers,
|  Waldo

-- 

Vadim Plessky
http://kde2.newmail.ru  (English)
33 Window Decorations and 6 Widget Styles for KDE
http://kde2.newmail.ru/kde_themes.html
KDE mini-Themes
http://kde2.newmail.ru/themes/