Qt 3.1b1

Neil Stevens neil at qualityassistant.com
Tue Sep 10 12:34:24 BST 2002

Hash: SHA1

On Tuesday September 10, 2002 01:41, Dirk Mueller wrote:
> On Die, 10 Sep 2002, Allan Sandfeld Jensen wrote:
> > Why "require" it if we dont need it?
> > It is going to have more bugs than the welltestet 3.0.5-6 release to
> > start with. Wouldnt it be better to support both even if this requires
> > a few #ifdefs to take advantage of new 3.1 features?
> There is an unsolved mystery in KDE development: as soon as you have a
> newer Qt version, suddenly some apps start to use the new stuff which
> wasn't there in older Qt versions.
> Additionally, all developers more or less instantly switch to the new Qt
> version, which means that the current KDE development isn't tested at
> all anymore with the old Qt version.

It's a good thing Trolltech is willing to keep compatible for us, then!

- -- 
Neil Stevens - neil at qualityassistant.com
"I always cheer up immensely if an attack is particularly wounding
because I think, well, if they attack one personally, it means they
have not a single political argument left." - Margaret Thatcher
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org


More information about the kde-core-devel mailing list