Qt 3.1b1

[Uwe Thiem]

On Tuesday 10 September 2002 10:41, Dirk Mueller wrote:
> On Die, 10 Sep 2002, Allan Sandfeld Jensen wrote:
> 
> > Why "require" it if we dont need it? 
> > It is going to have more bugs than the welltestet 3.0.5-6 release to start 
> > with. Wouldnt it be better to support both even if this requires a few 
> > #ifdefs to take advantage of new 3.1 features?
> 
> There is an unsolved mystery in KDE development: as soon as you have a newer 
> Qt version, suddenly some apps start to use the new stuff which wasn't there 
> in older Qt versions. 
> 
> Additionally, all developers more or less instantly switch to the new Qt 
> version, which means that the current KDE development isn't tested at all 
> anymore with the old Qt version. 

BTW: Is the patched 3.1b1 in qt-copy by now?

Uwe

-- 
Nothing is fool-proof given a sufficiently skilled fool.