kde 3.1 -- make Keramik default?

[Shawn Gordon]

At 02:05 PM 5/30/2002, you wrote:
>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>Hash: SHA1
>
>On Thursday May 30, 2002 02:01, Shawn Gordon wrote:
> > To hold to your argument, KDE3 should never have been
> > done.
>
>If the only argument for KDE 3 was subjective taste, then you're right.
>But KDE 3 includes many objective improvements over KDE 2.
>
>I'm not saying change is bad.  I'm saying change for the sake of change is
>bad.  If Keramik is so much better, merely asking for objective reasons to
>switch shouldn't be an onerous burden.

you've gotten lots of reasons you've just chosen to ignore their point of 
view, and you haven't provided a reason to support your position.  Why is 
change for the sake of change bad?  Where is this defined as a universal 
truth?  There is nothing inherently wrong with change for any reason.  I 
like to grow and shave different styles of beards every few months because 
I feel like having a change.  Women color their hair for the same 
reason.  People get hair cuts.  This is change for the sake of change, 
there is no other reason (unless it's to join the army).  So the fact that 
I shave my beard is bad because I did it for no other reason than because I 
wanted a change?



>- --
>Neil Stevens - neil at qualityassistant.com
>"I always cheer up immensely if an attack is particularly wounding
>because I think, well, if they attack one personally, it means they
>have not a single political argument left." - Margaret Thatcher
>
>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
>Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
>
>iD8DBQE89pQzf7mnligQOmERAgJKAKCb7yCT6/Z1ihLYjt5Hz/ldGsG1tQCfdcCZ
>LXfaYOqawpmV2OidCe4NOdk=
>=jUzJ
>-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Regards,

Shawn Gordon
President
theKompany.com
www.thekompany.com
949-713-3276