Proposal for KControl
Aaron J. Seigo
aseigo at olympusproject.org
Sun Jun 30 01:02:08 BST 2002
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On Saturday 29 June 2002 06:42, Charles Samuels wrote:
> True, I don't know what to say. Maybe instead an email kpart interface in
t'would be nice
> Why would a user configure kspell if they don't run it ? :)
heh.. of course they wouldn't, but expecting a user to figure out that the way
to configure it is to run a spell check on a document and click on configure
is not a very logical set of steps to expect them to go through.
it would be like telling them that to configure kmail they first have to send
a dummy email.
> They have konsole to configure with if they want. We have to consider that
> every item we put in KControl slows down the user further. Why provide
> more than one location to configure apps?
because if they only ever use konsole as a part in, say, konqi or kdevelop how
will they configure it? tell them to open up konsole itself? there ought to
be a place users can go to configure such parts in a central place.
and that central place ought to be specifically for kpart configuration. IMHO.
Aaron J. Seigo
GPG Fingerprint: 8B8B 2209 0C6F 7C47 B1EA EE75 D6B7 2EB1 A7F1 DB43
"Everything should be made as simple as possible, but not simpler"
- Albert Einstein
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the kde-core-devel