Proposal for KControl

[Aaron J. Seigo]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Saturday 29 June 2002 06:42, Charles Samuels wrote:
> True, I don't know what to say.  Maybe instead an email kpart interface in
> kdelibs?

t'would be nice

> Why would a user configure kspell if they don't run it ? :)

heh.. of course they wouldn't, but expecting a user to figure out that the way 
to configure it is to run a spell check on a document and click on configure 
is not a very logical set of steps to expect them to go through.

it would be like telling them that to configure kmail they first have to send 
a dummy email. 

> They have konsole to configure with if they want.  We have to consider that
> every item we put in KControl slows down the user further.  Why provide
> more than one location to configure apps?

because if they only ever use konsole as a part in, say, konqi or kdevelop how 
will they configure it? tell them to open up konsole itself? there ought to 
be a place users can go to configure such parts in a central place.

and that central place ought to be specifically for kpart configuration. IMHO.

- --
Aaron J. Seigo
GPG Fingerprint: 8B8B 2209 0C6F 7C47 B1EA  EE75 D6B7 2EB1 A7F1 DB43

"Everything should be made as simple as possible, but not simpler"
    - Albert Einstein
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE9HkqA1rcusafx20MRApn6AJwOhRNwh3h3yGuosOC93GRiBrBWswCeOk2j
2vdF/o3pJFngWSDfj+Ipsiw=
=KDzL
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----