Sub-library version numbers
    Kurt Granroth 
    granroth at kde.org
       
    Thu Jun  6 04:22:53 BST 2002
    
    
  
On Wednesday 05 June 2002 07:32 pm, George Staikos wrote:
> > > I would like to bump all three version numbers in both KDE_3_0_BRANCH
> > > and HEAD to
> > >
> > > libkjava.so.2
> > > libkjs.so.2
> > > libktexteditor.so.1
> > >
> > > Is there any reason (that I don't see) why this would be a bad idea?
> >
> > Because then we're BIC? Old KDE 3.0.0 apps would still link against the
> > original versions, which would no longer be present in KDE 3.0.2+.
>
> Why should the old ones be removed?
Damn.. I forgot about the linking.  It looks like I'm going to have to do 
this with a patch in the debian builds.  That'll work since there hasn't 
been ANY KDE 3 packages released in Debian yet.
FWIW, the reason I wanted to bump up the version numbers was to explicitely 
get rid of those versions in KDE3.  That's because they conflicted with the 
libs from KDE2 when you install both in /usr.  Basically, by not seeing 
this before we released KDE 3.0, we shot ourselves in the foot until KDE 
4.0.  Oh well. 
-- 
Kurt Granroth - "KDE -- Conquer Your Desktop"
KDE Developer/Evangelist | granroth at kde.org
http://www.granroth.org  | kurt at granroth.org
    
    
More information about the kde-core-devel
mailing list