Looking for feedback on Gnome/KDE article
lucy-ples at mtu-net.ru
Sat Dec 14 09:39:23 GMT 2002
On Friday 13 December 2002 8:39 pm, Marco Fioretti wrote:
| On Fri, Dec 13, 2002 12:21:10 at 12:21:10PM +0100, Stefan Gehn
| (sgehn at gmx.net) wrote:
| > I always forget that ctrl-c/ctrl-v only works in the QT part of my
| > desktop, GTK only uses the normal X-Clipboard. I doubt there will ever
| > be a perfect clipboard-system :)
| Exactly! This is what I'm trying to understand, and the kind of thing
| I'd like to see more interest/consciousness/development about: things
| that make possible *and* easy (for non developers too!) to mix any part
| of KDE, Gnome , or everything else maintaining
| integration/interworking. In that way, people could be use "pure KDE",
| "pure Gnome" or whatever without too many troubles.
IIRC, we have had "clipboard" thread n kde-core-devel recently
(cc:'ed to <o: <xdg-list at freedesktop.org> mailing list, archives at
It seems problems you mentioned would be fixed in upcoming GTK2/GNOME2
releases (GNOME 2.2, scheduled for the end of Jan.2003)
| > > * One standard, centralized, font management system, for both display
| > > and printing.
| > > VP: it's called FontConfig.
| > > KDE 3.1/Qt-3.1 use FontConfig.
| > Then push the rest of the world to follow. FontConfig probably will not
| > help me as a user with my OpenOffice nor will it help me with Gnumeric
| > or other gtk/gnome apps as long as they do not use the new technique.
| > The problem with standards and standard-libs is always the same: some
| > people just don't want to use it or do not have the time to write
| > support for it.
| > Are there any comments about FontConfig coming from other projects like
| > Mozilla, gtk, OO or whatever has to use FontConfig directly?
| Right again! Big (cross-platform!!) apps are one of the biggest
| problem, probably, they have to take so many things into account. I do
| plan, however, to ask similar questions on the Mozilla/OOo lists too,
| to build a list of everything that (teoretically) could be improved.
AFAIK, Galeon2 (based on GTK2/GNOME2) is in development, you will get AA and
FontConfig support out of GTK2 for it.
Same is valid about AbiWord (there is a development version which uses GTK2)
As about "pure Mozilla" - I realy don't know what are development plans for
<mozilla-layout> list seems to be dead (or very close to death) - just a few
people post on it, and very seldom. I am not subscribed to other Mozilla
lists (and use Mozilla itself only for testing purposes)
as about OpenOffice:
well, 2 years ago GNOME people promised to "disassemble OO into parts/objects,
make BONOBO objects out of those, and assemble those objects back into one
great Office Suite".
It seems this hasn't happen. Why? I really curious to know thier answer.
If you can get some answers - pls post them back to the list, or send
If OO gets, say, GTK2, or (even better) Qt 3.1 frontend - than problesm with
font configuration would magically disappear in one second.
Again, I am not aware about OO Roadmap and further developemnt direction.
I just know that it developing very slowly, and still very bloated.
Feel free to share info you can get.
| As already said, expect posts from me to Mozilla/OOo to hear what they
| say. Everybody else I should contact?
I think you should also contact authots of AbiWord and Gnumeric.
AFAIK, not all GNOME/GTK users share hype around OpenOffice, so pls give
AbiWord/Gnumeric hackers a chance to tell their opinion.
If you want to cover other office suites & browser developers as well - you
may want to contact Hancom Linux (Hancom Office) and Opera Software, too.
Both use Qt3 as a basis for thie producst, so most likely HancomOffice and
Opera are *compatible* with KDE apps. But they certanly use own preferences
for apps configuration, which is not very good. I would prefer it
intergrated into KDE Contol Center (as KControl modules), or into some "QT
| Marco Fioretti
SVG Icons * BlueSphere Icons 0.3.0 released
My KDE page
More information about the kde-core-devel