[PATCH] Re: [am_edit bug?] foo_CXXFLAGS doesn't seem to work

[Marc Mutz]

On Tuesday 10 December 2002 21:28, Dirk Mueller wrote:
> On Die, 10 Dez 2002, Marc Mutz wrote:
> > It's a bug in am_edit. Point.
> > Attached patch fixes it for me.
>
> Doesn't this completely mess up the idea of AM_DEPBACKSLASH ?
> Its the most simple fix though, indeed.

Frankly, I've no idea what @AMDEPBACKSLASH@ expands to other than a 
backslash, but if it's necessary to have this macro restored and not a 
plain backslash, then one should probably tag continuation lines with 
<number>ESC, where each <number> refers to a different @AM...BACKSLASH@ 
macro or the backslash itself...

Marc

-- 
[Norton SystemWorks 2002] Wipe Info uses hexadecimal values to wipe
files. This provides more security than wiping with decimal values.
                           -- Norton SystemWorks 2002 Manual, p.160
                              (seen on Cryptogram 12/01)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: signature
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-core-devel/attachments/20021210/b3b3240a/attachment.sig>