KMail (Was: Re: KDE 3.1: delayed)

[Andras Mantia]

 This was a reason why I said that sometimes you need software from BRANCH 
with kdelibs HEAD. ;-) I really hope that KMail will be stable soon.

Andras

On 2002. December 07., Saturday 15:50, Roger Larsson wrote:
> On Friday 06 December 2002 20:47, Ingo Klöcker wrote:
> > On Friday 06 December 2002 11:50, Michael Brade wrote:
> > > No idea about this, fact is that khtml and kmail are crashing
> > > quite often
> >
> > KMail? We are using it at our institute and so far it didn't crash a
> > single time. I hope you are reporting those crashes with meaningful
> > backtraces (i.e. compiled with --enable-debug=full).
> >
> > Regards,
> > Ingo
>
> I had KMail crash for me whenever I wanted to reply. But since I know
> that I used a some days old HEAD and not  KDE_3_1_BRANCH I tried
> to update it to get a corrected version (still HEAD).
>
> That version did not even compile...
> (static_cast to KMAcctImap from a KAccount, but KMAcctImap does not
>  inherit from KAccount... yet... it inherits from KMAccount that inherits
> from QObject)
>
> So I checked out KDE_3_1_BRANCH instead - it compiles and does not
> crash.
>
> /RogerL