KMail (Was: Re: KDE 3.1: delayed)
amantia at virtualartisans.com
Sat Dec 7 14:00:03 GMT 2002
This was a reason why I said that sometimes you need software from BRANCH
with kdelibs HEAD. ;-) I really hope that KMail will be stable soon.
On 2002. December 07., Saturday 15:50, Roger Larsson wrote:
> On Friday 06 December 2002 20:47, Ingo Klöcker wrote:
> > On Friday 06 December 2002 11:50, Michael Brade wrote:
> > > No idea about this, fact is that khtml and kmail are crashing
> > > quite often
> > KMail? We are using it at our institute and so far it didn't crash a
> > single time. I hope you are reporting those crashes with meaningful
> > backtraces (i.e. compiled with --enable-debug=full).
> > Regards,
> > Ingo
> I had KMail crash for me whenever I wanted to reply. But since I know
> that I used a some days old HEAD and not KDE_3_1_BRANCH I tried
> to update it to get a corrected version (still HEAD).
> That version did not even compile...
> (static_cast to KMAcctImap from a KAccount, but KMAcctImap does not
> inherit from KAccount... yet... it inherits from KMAccount that inherits
> from QObject)
> So I checked out KDE_3_1_BRANCH instead - it compiles and does not
More information about the kde-core-devel