KDE 3.1: delayed
neil at qualityassistant.com
Fri Dec 6 16:24:41 GMT 2002
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On Friday December 06, 2002 08:18, Navindra Umanee wrote:
> Simon Hausmann <hausmann at kde.org> wrote:
> > I share that opinion. The users have been waiting for 3.1 very long
> > now. A source release is IMHO better than none at all, especially
> > when it contains security fixes.
> Users hate pure source releases as far as I know. I often have people
> telling me stuff like they don't get the RC because there were no RPMs
> for XXX. It takes an awful lot of time to compile everything.
> For a release as big as 3.1, I'd say binary packages were very
Then someone had better take down that page that says KDE only ships
source. If KDE is going to delay releases to make it convienent for
binary packagers, then this should be documented.
Neil Stevens - neil at qualityassistant.com
Delenda est Carthago
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the kde-core-devel