Gnome Article on UI Design on /.
Nick Papadonis
nick at coelacanth.com
Mon Apr 22 21:03:52 BST 2002
Thomas Zander <zander at planescape.com> writes:
> On Mon, Apr 22, 2002 at 01:40:56PM -0400, George Staikos wrote:
>> On April 22, 2002 12:39, Thomas Zander wrote:
>> > On Mon, Apr 22, 2002 at 08:56:24AM -0700, Neil Stevens wrote:
>> > > On Sunday April 21, 2002 05:43, Nick Papadonis wrote:
>> > > > - You can't make EVERYONE happy with a design decision, however you
>> > > > can please most people and others can hack a configuration file for
>> > > > happiness.
>> > >
>> > > Hard to do that when we have people who complain at every new
>> > > configuration option and who try to reduce the configurability, though.
>> >
>> > Why?
>> > not providing a config like he said seems to 'reduce the configurability'
>> > IMO. If you 'hack a configuration file' then that has nothing to do with
>> > the configurability. But a lot more with coding/checking overhead (since
>> > you have to check for it in the software anyway). The GUI (o.a. me) people
>> > will not complain about that!
>>
>> I challenge you to edit the KSSL config files by hand.
>>
>> Editting config files is basically out of the question with KDE. What we
>> could do is have an "advanced" section in KControl. However it seems that
>> most people use the defaults, so having good defaults is probably better than
>> anything.
>>
> The point was not to allow settings to be edited with an editor; the point was
> to cut down on configuration options without hurting certain developers that
> _really_ want that feature.
>
> The latter does imply the former; but the reason why you are editing the file
> are different.
This was exactly my point. I claim there is some subset of features
that 90% of users want and another subset that 10% want.
Could kcontrolcenter be in favor of the 90% of users?
In addition to the above, we haven't talked about UI quality
assurance yet.
The more options added in kcontrolcenter, the more permuatations of
configuration must undergoe test before a 'reliable' KDE release.
Am I right?
- Nick
More information about the kde-core-devel
mailing list