Proposal: Mailing List owner policy

[Ben Cooksley]

On Wed, Sep 9, 2020 at 7:43 AM Albert Astals Cid <aacid at kde.org> wrote:

> El dimarts, 25 d’agost de 2020, a les 23:28:28 CEST, Albert Astals Cid va
> escriure:
> > So it seems there was some agreement that is something that could
> improve but we didn't 100% agree on what to do. I've scheduled an Akademy
> BoF, hopefully we can reach to a conclusion there.
> >
> > https://community.kde.org/Akademy/2020/Tuesday#Room_02_-_8th_September
>
> Summary of the discussion at https://share.kde.org/s/PeFRH82FmFgDrep
>
> I'll start contacting people about doing work for several points probably
> tomorrow :)
>

Thanks for the detailed summary from the BoF Albert, it's appreciated.

Responding to some of those points with my Sysadmin hat on:

> Enable archives on all the mailing lists that don't have it enabled

We should probably look at backfilling the archives for those lists as
well, given some of them are the older lists that document much of the
history of the KDE project (and should therefore be as best preserved as
possible)

> Where did the archives of the recently disabled/archive mailing lists go?
Still publicly available?

These archives should all still be accessible at
https://mail.kde.org/pipermail/$listname/

> Ask sysadmins if we can have a text file in invent...

Would it help if we created a team at https://invent.kde.org/teams/ for
this, to allow you to make use of the snippets/wiki functionality of Gitlab?


> Cheers,
>   Albert
>

Cheers,
Ben


>
> >
> > Cheers,
> >   Albert
> >
> > >
> > > Cheers,
> > >   Albert
> > >
> > > [1] yes, i know they are not the same, but since one is a subset of
> the other, let's pretend they are.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-community/attachments/20200909/393023a9/attachment.htm>